Theresa May’s Annual RevEUw

After one calamitous year, one snap general election and a one billion pound windfall for Northern Ireland in order that the DUP would prop up her minority government, the only certainty that the first anniversary of Theresa May‘s premiership has given us is not that Brexit might be a disaster but that it will be.

Despite her (now laughable) insistence that she offered the UK ‘strong and stable’ leadership, she and her government have been exposed as weak and wobbly, and, particularly in the case of Brexit, woefully underprepared for the scale, complexity and consequences that leaving would involve.

May has continued to insist on her plans to take Britain out of the single market and customs union, assuring doubters we don’t have to worry about the effects of this decision because we will be able negotiate a trade deal before Brexit, despite being repeatedly told by the likes of Michel Barnier, Guy Verhofstadt, and even MPs in her own party, that this isn’t possible.

Moreover, May has been constantly reassuring the British public that we don’t need to worry about issues surrounding the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, even though if the UK leaves the customs union there is no doubt that it will become a hard border between the UK and the EU. By announcing this, May has crucially misunderstood the delicate political situation on the island of Ireland, which will only be exacerbated by her dependence on the DUP in Westminster, and the current suspension of the Stormont assembly.

In the explanatory notes of the bill to trigger article 50, May’s government thoughtlessly announced its intention to quit the EU’s nuclear agreement, Euratom, which allows free movement of nuclear energy materials throughout all EU countries. This decision has been almost universally derided; it means that Britain’s access to radioactive isotopes needed to treat cancer patients, and the supplies it needs to support its nuclear plants, are now under threat. It is still incredibly concerning that May thought it was okay to announce such an important policy in a side note to a bill.

On the anniversary of the referendum vote, May and her team demonstrated that, even after a year, they still have a painfully poor understanding of the the complex issue of citizens‘ rights, and appeared oblivious to the ongoing and unnecessary instability that this is causing for millions of EU citizens living in the UK and Brits in other EU countries. Her plan has been severely criticised by both the EU and within the UK for the degree to which it reduces the rights of EU citizens, and would, if adopted as reciprocal, reduce the rights of British citizens abroad.

Throughout the year, May has failed to provide substance to her arguments. She has given no solid reasoning behind any of her decisions, initially repeating empty mantras such as ‘Brexit means Brexit’ to try and justify her choices. Furthermore, she has failed to articulate a vision or indeed any detailed plans of how she sees either a future relationship with the EU. Nor has the government produced detailed plans as to how they plan to keep Britain global when it loses access to all the benefits of the EU. How, even, it plans to support domestic sectors in Britain so supported by our membership, such as agriculture.

The citizens of the UK deserve more from their Prime Minister. They deserve to know why their future is no longer looking like the one promised by Brexiteers, even if this means (as it does) admitting these were lies. Increasingly, the public mood is looking like it would like to be given the opportunity to change its mind, and its Prime Minister.

Posted in:


  1. A referendum once the proposed terms post Brexit are known is a democratic necessity. This is the only way to know the the real will of the people on the real Brexit

  2. If there is one thing which characterises this government it is arrogance. May and her colleagues presume that the EU will do whatever they tell it. They ignore the fact that even the so-called ‘implementation’ phase is not something the UK can insist upon but will require the approval of all 27 member states. We certainly do require more from our PM, as you say, but whether we ‘deserve’ it is a moot point; apparently ‘we’ did after all vote for both Brexit and the Tories; sadly they got more votes than we did. The nation is getting what it voted for; let’s hope it wakes up soon and changes its collective mind!

  3. Good evening, Richard!

    I can feel a change of tone in your latest post.
    “Theresa May‘s premiership has given us is not that Brexit might be a disaster but that it will be.”
    Once again, very clearly, you state the huge problems that will rise with a hard Brexit.
    But, and I hope I am wrong, it seems you believe the essential won’t be changed now.
    Of course, as you stated in your short address in front of the European Parliament, British people should be allowed to think again and vote again. But probably that is too democratic for Ms May and her likes.

  4. Stubborn, indifferent to criticism and relentlessly wrong, Theresa May continues her pinball PM career, ricocheting from one disaster to the next. The reckless Euratom decision has nightmarish implications and her bizarre crusade against the ECJ and human rights in general defy any intelligent explanation.

    Apart from the callous treatment of EU migrants here, the loss to nationals of the opportunity to reside in any one of 27 EU countries is also massively offensive. The referendum empowered my compatriots to deny me and my offspring that freedom of domicile. To make a mild analogy, how would it be if those indifferent to football won a referendum that, as a by-product, prevented ardent fans from attending international matches? Would that ‘democracy’ be acceptable?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.