Alarming Conversation with a British diplomat – is this the line the government’s peddling?

At a diplomatic reception in the capital of a large developing Commonwealth country, a conversation between a senior UK diplomat and 3 UK parliamentarians from different parties took place along the following lines: 

Diplomat: They’re very excited about Brexit here.  Their eyes light up when you mention it.

Why is that?

They think we’ve neglected them. I’ve told them that we’ll now be able to focus more on them.

How so? Aren’t we cutting staff at our non-European embassies at the moment?

Yes, but the key thing is that we’ll be free to do trade deals!

Don’t we have one now?

Yes, through the EU, but now we’ll be able to offer them a bespoke deal.

What will we be able to offer them, given that, as an LDC [Less Developed Country], they already have duty free and quota free access to our market?

We can offer a bespoke deal when they graduate from LDC status to being a middle income country. Under EU rules, to keep access, they’ll have to follow all kinds of rules and red-tape. We can offer to scrap that.

What kind of rules are you thinking of?

International Labour Organisation [ILO] conventions that the EU insists on.

So Britain would say “don’t worry about child labour, safety, rights at work, we’ll turn a blind eye to such matters?

We’d say it’s up to them to choose which standards they want to apply. We won’t restrict their exports because of their choices.

So you think they’d be happy to lower their standards, cease applying international norms, and thereby lose access to the EU market (which is their main export market) and to other markets, just because Britain says it won’t hold them to international rules?

No, I’m saying that we’re free to make deals tailored to their needs.

That’s the message being pushed by Britain?

I’m a civil servant. I’m just explaining the options available to ministers. It will be their decision. But these options are always well received when I mention them here on private occasions like dinner parties.

How long have you been posted here?

Two and a half weeks.

Posted in:

7 Comments

  1. Is it permissable for a country such as you describe to send goods to the EU manufactured in accordance with EU regulations and at the same time send similar goods made by underage children to a ‘liberal’ Brexit state?

    ‘Cake and eat it’ for the orginating country, but indesgistible for the Brexit state who could not market it onwards and would have to consume it internally. The result might be that the Brexit state would not be willing to pay the full price for these goods, leaving a net balance in returns to the originating country.

  2. No, thinking about it I’m wrong.

    The EU require the originating country to have these ILO conventions, that means they apply to the whole of the country. If the future Brexit state wanted to make a deal, the originating ountry would have to remove the ILO from their statute book, or cease enforcing it. It would not be possible to send goods out from two different legal structures.

    Anyway I guess the differne in price would be marginal.

  3. Dear me, I hope this was a very junior diplomat. They obviously don’t have the first idea about international treaty law or trade agreements let alone being able to see the bigger picture!

  4. Liam Fox said precisely the same thing in a talk given to a local conservative association as long ago as Autumn 2016. He said countries were lining up to sign trade deals with us the moment it was allowed on exactly the same terms as those they now have with the EU, minus the ‘political’ clauses (i.e. those mentioned in the article).

    Just to clarify, apparently that’s exactly the SAME deals that we are currently shackled to via our membership of the EU, which are holding us back from being a global trading power.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

2 × three =