Brexit: Now The Real Problems Start

Proceeding with Brexit involves difficult choices.

On the economy:

  • EITHER we distance ourselves from the EU (our neighbours and main trading partners), causing huge damage to our economy, losing thousands of jobs and hurting our public finances.
  • OR we stay close to the EU, especially the customs union and the single market (both of which have non-EU countries participating), but then have to follow the rules without having a say on them anymore.

Neither is good for Britain, although the second is less economically damaging.

On security:

  • EITHER we leave the joint police databases, the shared criminal records, the common efforts to find and catch cross-border gangs, traffickers and terrorists, etc.
  • OR we ask the EU to let us stay in them anyway, but we’d not have a say anymore on how they’re run or the rules and safeguards that apply.

It’s the same choice again on the EU technical agencies where we currently pool resources to cut costs on things like the testing of medicines (European Medicines Agency), of chemicals (European Chemicals Agency) or of aircraft (European Air Safety Agency):

  • EITHER we set up our own separate agencies, at great cost, recruiting the necessary expertise, duplicating work already done and having to get them recognised across the world.
  • OR we ask if we can stay in the EU agencies anyway, but without a say anymore on how they’re run or the standards they apply.

The Johnson deal does not “Get Brexit done”. In fact, it’s simply the end of the first, easier, and less important part – the exit arrangements. Now come the negotiations on the future relationship. It means years more wrangling, arguments and division. Not to mention the tensions Brexit is creating for the UK in:

  • Northern Ireland, with the creation of a customs border causing immense practical and political difficulties.
  • Scotland, where proceeding with Brexit will help the SNP to argue for secession.
  • Gibraltar, whose status is legally safeguarded in the EU, but weakened outside it.

On top of that, we’ve had:

  • An incompetent government, which started the Brexit negotiations before having a plan on what it wanted – and is about to do the same on the trade talks.
  • Bitter divisions among Brexit supporters about what Brexit means. For example, Johnson voted against May’s deal, and Farage opposed Johnson’s deal.

Johnson wants to put customs checks between GB and Northern Ireland, remove the level playing field commitments on workers’ rights, environmental and consumer protection rules, and inflict huge extra costs on businesses trading with Europe, disrupting our supply chains and our exports.

Leaving the Customs Union would not just damage trade with Europe (our main trading partners with many vital cross-border supply chains), but also damage our trade with the rest of the world:

  • We would drop out of all the trade deals with countries across the planet that we had previously negotiated jointly as members of the EU, with the clout and leverage of the world’s largest market.
  • We would have to replace them with new agreements, in a hurry, negotiating just as Britain, without the clout of Europe behind us.
  • People are already afraid of what a trade deal with the USA would bring in terms of having to accept US food products with lower standards than ours, including chlorinated chicken etc, or conceding privileged access to the NHS for American pharmaceutical and health companies.

The British government repeats again and again that Brexit means we’ll “take back control” of our borders, our laws and our money  In fact we’ll have less control of all three:

  • Borders: we’ll drop out of the EU’s cross-border policing arrangements and shared data on criminals that help us police our borders.
  • Laws: as a sovereign country, we already adopt our own laws, it’s just that we choose to adopt some laws jointly with our neighbours when we think that’s useful, mostly the common rules for the common market. This comes to about one-tenth of our laws. Leaving the EU means we’ll have no say on those common European laws, many of which will affect us anyway. We become a rule-taker, not a rule-maker.
  • Money: 98% of public spending is national. The 2% of public spending that we do jointly at EU level is often on items where doing things jointly saves money by avoiding duplication, such as on research programmes. In any case, the magnitude of this is far smaller than the costs of Brexit to our economy and our exchequer.

One issue is what will happen to our right to freedom of movement within the EU. Brexiters often play the “immigration” card, claiming we can’t control migration to Britain if we keep the EU rules on freedom of movement. In fact:

  • Most migration to Britain comes from outside the EU, entirely under our own national rules, so we can be as liberal or as restrictive as we want.
  • The EU’s internal freedom of movement is a reciprocal right with nearly two million Brits in other EU countries who now risk losing their rights and protections if we drop out of the freedom of movement legislation. If large numbers return to Britain, especially among those who have retired abroad, it will mean more pressure on social care and the NHS.
  • EU freedom of movement is subject to conditions such as finding work within a short period, or not being a burden on the exchequer. Britain chose not to fully enforce these conditions, but could if it wanted to, within EU rules.
  • EU citizens in the UK pay one-third more to Britain in taxes than they take out in services or as benefits. If many leave, it will COST us money.
  • Until we train enough nurses and doctors, we need EU citizens desperately in our NHS.

In short, the lies told by Johnson and the Leave campaign are about to come home to roost:

  • They said Brexit would be easy – it’s throwing up all kinds of problems they never told us about.
  • They said it would save loads of money (which would all go to the NHS) –it’s costing a fortune.
  • They said it would be good for the economy – the opposite is true.
Posted in:

7 Comments

  1. A perfect analysis. The Tories have been seduced into some kind of collective delusion, with many of the arch-proponents of Brexit conveniently – and hypocritically – suffering amnesia in respect of their previous statements on how damaging Brexit will be (Sajid Javid being the latest to do so).
    The wheels are undoubtedly going to come of the wagon of the UK economy, and most, if not all, of the claimed benefits (controlling laws, borders and ,money) will prove illusory.
    Will the Tories own this disaster as it slowly unfolds? Not a chance.

  2. All the above said, I’m almost as angry with the Labour Party as I am with the Tories. After all the myriad cock-ups of the Government since 2015, Labour should have been filleting them in the Commons and streets ahead in the polls. Yet the party managed to lose sight of the fact that to implement ANY socially just policy, it first has to win power. That didn’t happen courtesy of infighting amongst MPs over Corbyn’s election, the failure to either tackle or rebut anti-semitism, its Janus-like approach to Brexit and the veritable cornucopia of manifesto policies – individually reasonable, collectively undeliverable – that left too many of the electorate seeing Labour as divided and unrealistic.
    Hence Labour will be, in my view, as culpable for the impending Brexit disaster as the Conservatives having failed to provide the electorate with a credible alternative to what is one of the least regarded Tory administrations in history.

  3. Thanks – nicely put but we Remainers know and understand all this – the problem is getting the Leavers to realise that they are hovering with one foot already over the cliff-edge ….and persuade them to help us do something about it!

  4. I cant understand with all the illegal actions and lies bandied about, where were the courts and legal entities in all this? Were they hog tied and locked in a cupboard? Where were the law enforcers – the ones that ensure fair and legal parliamentary dealings? They appear to have lain down and let Johnson walk all over them.
    What the hell is going on!!!

  5. An excellent summary of where we find ourselves with 10 days to go before we leave and begin the next, arguably more complex, stage. Thank you, Richard, for your tireless work for the pro-EU cause over the years – it really is much appreciated. Angela (@spaceangel1964)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.